Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jerrell MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; James M. LeBlanc; Jerry Goodwin; Kevin Wyles, Defendants-Appellees
Jerrell Marshall, Louisiana prisoner # 470174, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the dismissal of his purported civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also moves for appointment of counsel. In his complaint, Marshall alleged that he had been held past his release date. Because he sought immediate release from prison, in addition to money damages, the district court held that the complaint was, in substance, a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and that Marshall had not exhausted his state court remedies. The district court denied Marshall leave to appeal IFP and certified that the appeal was not in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
In this court, Marshall repeats his claim of wrongful detention, but he does not challenge the district court’s reasons for the dismissal or the certification. See id. Because he fails to show any issue of arguable merit, his appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The motion for leave to appeal IFP is DENIED; the motion to appoint counsel is DENIED; and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM: * FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-30745
Decided: December 10, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)