Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario Delgado CRUZ, also known as Mario Delgado, also known as Mario Cruz Delgado, also known as Daniel Delgado, also known as Mario Cruz-Delgado, Defendant-Appellant
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Mario Delgado Cruz appealed following his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He asserted that that the district court reversibly erred by convicting, sentencing, and entering judgment against him under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based upon its determination that his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation qualified as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) and, therefore, an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F). This court affirmed in United States v. Cruz, 692 F. App'x 187, 187-88 (5th Cir. 2017). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018). In Dimaya, 138 S.Ct. at 1210, 1223, the Supreme Court invalidated the § 16(b) crime of violence definition as unconstitutionally vague.
At our request, Cruz and the Government submitted supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of Dimaya. They agree that in light of Dimaya’s invalidation of § 16(b), Cruz’s prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation does not constitute an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Godoy, 890 F.3d 531, 536-42 (5th Cir. 2018). As a result, the judgment erroneously reflects that Cruz was sentenced as an aggravated felon under § 1326(b)(2). See id. at 542.
Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to reflect that the statutory sentencing provision is § 1326(b)(1), not § 1326(b)(2), and for deletion of the incorrect description of the offense as “[i]llegal re-entry by a previously deported alien after an aggravated felony conviction.” In all other respects, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM: * FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-20785
Decided: October 02, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)