SURREY OAKS v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

SURREY OAKS, L.L.C.; Stanley Xu; Nanling Chen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-10858

Decided: June 20, 2018

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

Russell Joseph Bowman, Bowman & Stella, L.L.P., Irving, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Thomas Hal Cook, Jr., Esq., Shannon Marie O'Malley, Zelle, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee

Appellants believe Evanston Insurance failed to discharge its obligation to include Surrey Oaks as a payee on an insurance policy claim check. In response, Evanston Insurance asserts it did not know Surrey Oaks was entitled to the policy proceeds.

After carefully considering the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record, we find no error by the district court. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court essentially for the reasons articulated by the court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order of July 19, 2017.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.

PER CURIAM: * FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law