Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jaime Alberto MARTINEZ-DE PAZ, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent
Jaime Alberto Martinez-De Paz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, has petitioned this court for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Reviewing the BIA’s factual findings for substantial evidence, see Orellana-Monson v. Holder, 685 F.3d 511, 517-18 (5th Cir. 2012), we deny the petition.
First, the BIA reasonably applied this court’s precedent to the facts in concluding that Martinez-De Paz’s account of a single incident of criminal economic extortion by gang members was not cognizable as persecution for asylum purposes. See Morales v. Sessions, 860 F.3d 812, 815 (5th Cir. 2017); Castillo-Enriquez v. Holder, 690 F.3d 667, 668 (5th Cir. 2012). Martinez fails to demonstrate that the evidence compels a different result. See Orellana-Monson, 685 F.3d at 518. Second, because Martinez-De Paz failed to establish his eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the higher standard applicable to withholding of removal. See id. Third, Martinez demonstrates no error in the BIA’s rejection of his speculative claim that he would be tortured with the acquiescence of government officials upon his return to El Salvador. See Morales, 860 F.3d at 818.
PETITION DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM: * FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-60416
Decided: May 22, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)