Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher GAMEZ, Defendant-Appellant
After pleading guilty of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, Defendant-Appellant Christopher Gamez was sentenced to 360 months of imprisonment, the bottom of the applicable guidelines range of 360-480 months. Gamez contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.
We review de novo a district court’s determination whether a defendant is eligible for a § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction, and for abuse of discretion a decision whether to reduce a sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236-37 (5th Cir. 2009). In urging that the district court miscalculated his guidelines range under Amendment 782, Gamez fails to account for his receipt of a two-level increase as an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of criminal activity. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). Gamez’s guidelines range was not, in fact, lowered by Amendment 782 for the reasons stated by the district court. The district court thus did not err in holding that Gamez is not eligible for a § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B), p.s. & comment. (n.1(A) ); Doublin, 572 F.3d at 237.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM: * FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 17-10751
Decided: May 15, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)