RAZIEN v. MICRO FOCUS US INCORPORATED (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jason RAZIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICRO FOCUS (US), INCORPORATED; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-50724

Decided: February 23, 2018

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Kaushik Rambhotla, Esq., Rambhotla Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Martin Fulkerson, Esq., Fulkerson Lotz, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Micro Focus (US), Incorporated Darren Glenn Gibson, Salvador Davila, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Jason Razien appeals the dismissal of his Title VII complaint. The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, complaint, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no error of law or reversible error of fact. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.

PER CURIAM: * FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law