Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; Tyler Regional Hospital, L.L.C.; Dr. Adam Corley, Plaintiffs—Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Office of Personnel Management; United States Department of Labor; United States Department of Treasury; Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity; Charles Ezell, in his official capacity as the Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management; Scott Bessent, Secretary, U.S. Department of Treasury, in his official capacity; Lori Chavez-Deremer, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, in her official capacity, Defendants—Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
Lifenet, Incorporated; Air Methods Corporation; Rocky Mountain Holdings, L.L.C.; East Texas Air One, L.L.C., Plaintiffs—Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. United States Department of Health and Human Services; Office of Personnel Management; United States Department of Labor; United States Department of Treasury; Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity; Charles Ezell, in his official capacity as the Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management; Scott Bessent, Secretary, U.S. Department of Treasury, in his official capacity; Lori Chavez-Deremer, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, in her official capacity, Defendants—Appellants.
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated October 30, 2024, is VACATED.
Per Curiam:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 23-40605
Decided: May 30, 2025
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)