Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PLAQUEMINES PARISH, Plaintiff—Appellee, Louisiana State; Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary, Intervenors—Appellees, v.
BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, As Successor in Interest to Amoco Production Company; Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, L.P.; Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Chevron Oil Company, the California Company and Gulf Oil Corporation; Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to The Superior Oil Company; Shell Offshore, Incorporated; Shell Oil Company; Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Texaco E&P Incorporated. And Texaco Incorporated; Texas Company; Chevron Pipe Line Company, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Refining Company, Defendants—Appellants, v. Parish of Cameron, Plaintiff—Appellee,
State of Louisiana, ex rel, on behalf of Jeff Landry; State of Louisiana, on behalf of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of Office of Coastal Management, on behalf of Thomas F. Harris, Intervenor Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. BP America Production Company; Chevron U.S.A. Incorporated, Own Capacity & as successor in interest, on behalf of California Company; Shell Oil Company; Swepi, L.P., Defendants—Appellants.
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED because, at the request of one of its members, the court was polled, and a majority did not vote in favor of rehearing (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35).
In the en banc poll, six judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Richman, Willett, Duncan, Oldham, and Wilson), and seven judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Elrod and Judges Stewart, Southwick, Graves, Higginson, Engelhardt, and Ramirez).
Per Curiam:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 23-30294
Decided: October 31, 2024
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)