UNITED STATES v. TRUESDALE (2021)

Alvin B. Truesdale appeals the district court's orders: denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion and supplemental motion for a sentence reduction; denying his motions to dismiss the indictment or charges in the indictment; denying his motion and addenda to the motion for recusal of the presiding district court judge and for a hearing; and denying his motion in which he sought the removal of another district court judge and an Assistant United States Attorney from the electronic noticing system with respect to his cases. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Truesdale, No. 3:92-cr-00034-RJC-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2021 & Feb. 4, 2021). We deny Truesdale's motions for appointment of counsel, to certify questions to this court, to stay action on this appeal pending rulings by the district court, for the production of documents and court records, and for a hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.