Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jontavious Kyree LYONS, Defendant - Appellant.
United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jontavious Kyree Lyons, Defendant - Appellant.
In these consolidated appeals, Jontavious Kyree Lyons seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on Lyons’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.1 We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction because Lyons failed to file a timely notice of appeal.
When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court entered its order on June 10, 2020. Lyons filed a notice of appeal, at the earliest, on March 31, 2021.2 Because Lyons failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeals.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
FOOTNOTES
1. Although Lyons was charged and convicted in two separate criminal cases, the district court issued a single order denying Lyons’ present § 2255, which listed the case numbers for both cases.
2. For purposes of these appeals, we assume that the date on Lyons’ notice of appeal was the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (establishing prison mailbox rule).
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 21-6730, No. 21-6731
Decided: September 14, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)