Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert Dale STRICKLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections; Larry Edmonds, Warden Lunenburg Correctional Center; Nurse Clement, Medical Administrator Lunenburg Correctional Center; Nurse Lawrence, Pharmacy Nurse, LPN; Nurse Lowrance, Head Nurse, LCC LPN; Nurse Abernathy, LPN; Nurse Thaxton, LPN; Nurse Edmonds, LPN; Nurse Jackson, LPN Doctor's Assistant; Nurse Vaughn, LPN; Nurse Alexander, LPN; Nurse Iqbal, current chief medical officer LCC; Dr. Nwaokocha, Chief of medical at LCC prior to Feb. 2019; T. Webb, Food Service Administrator LCC; Ms. Greg, Statewide dietitian, Defendants - Appellees.
Robert Dale Strickler, a former Virginia inmate, seeks to appeal the district court's order denying class certification, denying a preliminary injunction, dismissing as moot Strickler's motions to expedite review and amend the complaint, and ordering Strickler to file an amended complaint in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). With the exception of the denial of Strickler's motion for a preliminary injunction, the order Strickler seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.* Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. To the extent Strickler's notice of appeal can be construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) petition for permission to appeal the denial of the class certification, permission is denied.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. The denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction is immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). However, Strickler requested immediate release from custody in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the record indicates he has since been released from custody. Accordingly, we dismiss as moot this portion of his appeal. See Rendelman v. Rouse, 569 F.3d 182, 186 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[A]s a general rule, a prisoner's transfer or release from a particular prison moots his claims for injunctive ․ relief with respect to his incarceration there.”).
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 21-6530
Decided: August 24, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)