MCCALLUP DSC v. ENVOY OF WILLIAMSBURG (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Estate of Jerry Theodore MCCALLUP Jr.; Veronica McCallup, DSC, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ENVOY OF WILLIAMSBURG, and Affiliated Businesses; Scarlett Huang, Compliance Officer; Brian L. Stevenson; Envoy Corporate Offices; City of Williamsburg Department of Human Services; Mark R. Herring, The State of Virginia Attorney General; Adam Kinsman, County Attorney for Williamsburg and James City County; County of James City County; Commonwealth Attorney and Board of Supervisors; Consulate Health Care; Ciera; Britany Moore; Department of Human Services Social Services Division; Envoy Affiliate Corporations; Deborah Shelton Al-Jarboua; Jeremy McCallup; Fahad Al-Jarboua; Jerry Theo McCallup; Judge Williamsburg; United States Army Fort Bragg; The Doctors in charge of care and Doctors who cared for Mr. Jerry Theodore McCallup Jr.; Police That Took Mr. Jerry Theodore McCallup from his home; Sheriffs James City County Government Center; Williamsburg Human Services; Wendy Evans; Any and All Insurance Policies of Plaintiff Jerry Theodore McCallup Jr.; Jeremy McCallup's Wife; Sentara Healthcare; City of Williamsburg, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 21-1567

Decided: August 24, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Estate of Jerry Theodore McCallup, Jr.; Veronica McCallup, Appellants Pro Se.

Veronica McCallup appeals the district court's order denying her motion to recuse the district judge, which she filed after her underlying civil action had already been dismissed. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision to deny the recusal motion. See Kolon Indus. Inc. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 748 F.3d 160, 167 (4th Cir. 2014) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny McCallup's motion to stay the proceedings and affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law