Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Louis D. GIBSON, a/k/a L.D. Gibson, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GILES CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a division of Premier Magnesia, LLC, Defendant - Appellee.
Louis D. Gibson seeks to appeal the district court's order staying the underlying proceedings pending arbitration in Gibson's civil action, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, against Giles Chemical Corporation (“Giles”).
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The appealed-from order stayed the district court proceedings pending arbitration of Gibson's claims; ordered the parties to file a status update 14 days before the arbitration proceeding that detailed the likely cost of arbitration to Gibson; and denied Gibson's motion for summary judgment without prejudice to Gibson refiling the motion at a later date. Consequently, we conclude that the order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See 9 U.S.C. § 16(b); cf. Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 612-15 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 1376, 209 L.Ed.2d 122 (2021). We therefore grant Giles’ motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Gibson's motions to appoint counsel, to schedule oral argument, and to amend the caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 21-1519
Decided: August 26, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)