TANG v. SCHMOKE 2009 2016 (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Hong TANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Kurt L. SCHMOKE, President of the University of Baltimore; Darlene Brannigan Smith, Executive Vice President; Joseph S. Wood, Provost (2009-2016); Kathleen Anderson, Dean of Students; Roger E. Hartley, Dean of the College of Public Affairs; Christy Lee Koontz, Former Assistant Dean of Students; Patria De Lancer Julnes, Former Instructor, Defendants - Appellees.
Hong Tang, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Kurt L. Schmoke, President of the University of Baltimore; Darlene Brannigan Smith, Executive Vice President; Joseph S. Wood, Provost (2009-2016); Kathleen Anderson, Dean of Students; Roger E. Hartley, Dean of the College of Public Affairs; Christy Lee Koontz, Former Assistant Dean of Students; Patria De Lancer Julnes, Former Instructor, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 20-2308, No. 21-1243

Decided: August 05, 2021

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Hong Tang, Appellant Pro Se. Lillian Lane Reynolds, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.

Hong Tang appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's dismissal on statute of limitations grounds for the reasons stated by the district court. Tang v. Schmoke, No. 1:19-cv-02965-SAG (D. Md. Nov. 6, 2020; July 27, 2020; Mar. 3, 2021). Because the Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration was included in the electronic record before this court, we deny as moot the motion to supplement the record on appeal with a copy of the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law