Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Emmanuel Lee MCGRIFF EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Judge William BLAND; Matt Delbridge, District Attorney; John Doe 1; John Doe 2, Defendants - Appellees.
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court entered its order dismissing McGriff El's complaint on October 9, 2020, thereby affording McGriff El until November 9, 2020, to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1)(C). McGriff El filed in the district court an affidavit dated February 24, 2021, stating that he had not received any correspondence from the district court since February 2020 and that he would like to proceed with his case, including reopening it if it had been dismissed. McGriff El's filing included a notice of appeal. Because McGriff El sought permission to reopen his case, claimed he did not receive the district court's final order, and the affidavit was filed within 180 days after entry of the court's order, we construe the filing as a motion to reopen the time to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether McGriff El can satisfy the requirements for reopening the appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
PER CURIAM:
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 21-6355
Decided: July 23, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)