Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carla T. LEWIS, a/k/a Carla Lewis, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Marilyn K. KHADDURI, trading as The Marilyn Khadduri Company; Tri-Stone Properties LLC; Daniel Khadduri; Khadduri Enterprise, Inc., trading as Majid D. Khadduri, Defendants - Appellees.
Carla T. Lewis seeks to appeal the district court's order remanding her case to Richmond County Circuit Court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.* In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court entered its order on August 19, 2020. Lewis filed the notice of appeal on September 23, 2020. Because Lewis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We further deny Lewis’ “motion for entry of judgment,” “motion to stable probate,” “motion to claim equity [and] cash,” and “motion for no more filing by the [Appellees].” We further deny Appellees’ motions for attorney's fees and costs.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. In any event, we lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 196 (4th Cir. 2008).
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-2038
Decided: April 30, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)