Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Claretta C. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Denis R. MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant - Appellee.
Claretta C. Green, an African American female, appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) on Green's race and sex discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.* On appeal, Green assigns error to the district court's determination that Green failed to adequately plead that the VA's failure to comply with its post-payment procedures was an adverse employment action to support her discrimination claims. Green also asserts that the court erred in finding there were no genuine issues of material fact as to whether the VA acted with discriminatory intent when it reported Green to the National Practitioner Data Bank and the South Carolina Board of Nursing.
We have considered the parties’ arguments and reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Green v. Wilkie, No. 2:18-cv-00788-DCN, 2020 WL 2319019 (D.S.C. May 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. Green also brought a Title VII harassment claim against the VA, as well as a retaliation claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 26011-2654, and a Fifth Amendment due process claim. Green abandoned her harassment and FMLA claims in her opposition to the VA's summary judgment motion, and later abandoned her due process claim by failing to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss that claim. See Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985).
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-1635
Decided: March 22, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)