Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rony Estuardo GUDIEL POLANCO, Petitioner, v. Merrick B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
Rony Estuardo Gudiel Polanco, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge's denial of his request for release on bond. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
We have jurisdiction only over final orders of removal or deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1); see Amaya v. Rosen, 986 F.3d 424, 429 (4th Cir. 2021). Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(47)(A), an “order of deportation” is defined as “the order of the special inquiry officer, or other such administrative officer to whom the Attorney General has delegated the responsibility for determining whether an alien is deportable, concluding that the alien is deportable or ordering deportation.”
Here, the immigration judge's decision does not conclude that Gudiel Polanco is removable or order his removal. Rather, the proceedings before the agency pertained to Gudiel Polanco's request for release on bond; challenges to an alien's detention must be brought pursuant to a habeas corpus petition. See Hosh v. Lucero, 680 F.3d 375, 378 (4th Cir. 2012); Flores-Torres v. Mukasey, 548 F.3d 708, 711 (9th Cir. 2008); Bah v. Cangemi, 548 F.3d 680, 683 n.3 (8th Cir. 2008). In any event, the Government notes that Gudiel Polanco was removed on October 23, 2020, which renders the petition for review moot. See N.C. State Conference of the NAACP v. Raymond, 981 F.3d 295, 302 (4th Cir. 2020) (“A suit becomes moot, and we lose jurisdiction, when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever to the prevailing party.” (internal quotation marks omitted)).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-1829
Decided: March 17, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)