RUFUS v. SEYMOUR (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Michael Alonza RUFUS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. Margaret B. SEYMOUR; Kevin Frank McDonald; Courts of the United States; State Bar of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

No. 20-7025

Decided: February 16, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 217, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980); Haase v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 838 F.3d 665, 666-67 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam); Glick v. Edwards, 803 F.3d 505, 509 (9th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Rufus v. Seymour, No. 6:20-cv-01394-MBS, 2020 WL 3548265 (D.S.C. June 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law