MYERS v. SAUL (2021)

Everett Myers appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing Myers’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; he also appeals the court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Myers v. Saul, No. 2:18-cv-00498-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2019 & Oct. 15, 2019).^* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   The district court executed the margin order denying Rule 59[e] relief on October 11, 2019, and entered it on the docket on October 15, 2019.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.