UNITED STATES v. SHARPE (2021)

Justin Brooks Sharpe appeals the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's order denying his request for bond pending a decision on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sharpe, No. 1:17-cr-00322-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 1, 2020). We deny the motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to the collateral order doctrine. See Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 265-66, 104 S.Ct. 1051, 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984) (citing Stack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1, 72 S.Ct. 1, 96 L.Ed. 3 (1951)); cf. United States v. Sueiro, 946 F.3d 637, 639-41 (4th Cir. 2020) (citations omitted). We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. See Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183, 129 S.Ct. 1481, 173 L.Ed.2d 347 (2009); United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.