BRAXTON v. SIMON (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Savino BRAXTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. David SIMON; Edward Burns; Home Box Office, Inc., In Their Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 20-7125

Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.

Savino Braxton appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Braxton's motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braxton v. Simon, No. 1:20-cv-00094-JKB, 2020 WL 4003167 (D. Md. July 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law