BRAXTON v. SIMON (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Savino BRAXTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. David SIMON; Edward Burns; Home Box Office, Inc., In Their Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 20-7125

Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.

Savino Braxton appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Braxton's motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braxton v. Simon, No. 1:20-cv-00094-JKB, 2020 WL 4003167 (D. Md. July 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network