NEVILLE MD v. MCCAGHREN (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Robert NEVILLE, MD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Elizabeth C. MCCAGHREN, Defendant - Appellee.
Robert Neville, MD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Betsy McCaghren, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 20-2017, No. 20-2020

Decided: December 28, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Robert Neville, Appellant Pro Se.

In these consolidated appeals, Robert Neville appeals the district court's order denying Neville's motion for recusal. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Neville's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition of the motion for recusal, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law