IN RE: Henry Earl MILLER (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Henry Earl MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan, Petitioner.

No. 20-1897

Decided: December 21, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.

Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on Miller's motion. On August 21, 2020, the court instructed the government to file a response. In September, the government filed a response in opposition and Miller filed a reply to the Government's response. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law