WRIGHT v. OXENDINE (2020)

Anthony Wright appeals the district court's order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing without prejudice Wright's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint on the ground that Wright failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Ross v. Blake, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S Ct. 1850, 1854-55, 195 L.Ed.2d 117 (2016) (stating that inmate must exhaust available administrative remedies before filing suit challenging prison conditions). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Oxendine, No. 5:18-ct-03146-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.