STEWART v. BISHOP CCMS II CCMS II (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Maurice Bernard STEWART, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank BISHOP, Warden; Bruce Liller, Mental Health Professional Counselor - Advanced; CCMS II Charlotte Zies; Social Worker I Monica Wilson; CCMS II Shayla Lease; Lt. Bradley Wilt, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-6888

Decided: December 16, 2020

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-03009-JFM (filed Feb. 16, 2017; entered Feb. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network