HARRIOT v. UNITED STATES USM FBI (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Michael Owen HARRIOT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, United States Marshals; Unknown USM; Unknown Deputy Marshals; FBI Robert Waizenhofer, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 20-7218

Decided: November 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Owen Harriot appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Harriot's complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. We agree with the district court's conclusion that Harriot's complaint was barred by the relevant statutes of limitations. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Harriot v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-01266-JFA, 2020 WL 4499987 (D.S.C. Aug. 5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law