UNITED STATES v. MARTIN (2020)

Jeremy Randolph Martin appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify the conditions of his supervised release by eliminating two conditions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. McLeod, 972 F.3d 637, 644-46 (4th Cir. 2020) (holding that motion to modify conditions of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) “is impermissible [if] it rests on the factual and legal premises that existed at the time of [the defendant's] sentencing”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.