WILLIAMS v. LEWIS (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Larry WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott B. LEWIS; Susan M. Duffy; Felicia Ogunsile; Adam T. Bradburn; Captain Lane; Officer Butler, Unit Counselor; Warden Gland, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-6813

Decided: September 29, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Smith, LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Larry Williams appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Williams’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Williams’ remaining state law claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Lewis, No. 5:19-cv-00182-MGL, 2020 WL 2537426 (D.S.C. May 19, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law