DUNSTON v. JOYNER (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Joseph A. DUNSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hector JOYNER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 20-6272

Decided: September 30, 2020

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Joseph A. Dunston, Appellant Pro Se.

Joseph A. Dunston, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting Respondent's motion for summary judgment, and denying relief on Dunston's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Dunston challenged the execution of the sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunston v. Joyner, No. 5:19-cv-01960-TMC, 2020 WL 635709 (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law