Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FLOWERS MINISTRIES, INC., a non-profit organization chartered in South Carolina; J.L. Flowers, President; Tonya Holmes; Lisa Allen; Fernando Camacho; Elizabeth Mosley; Valerie Collins; Lonzell McKnight, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mayor Gloria HINES; Alderman Coleman Cannon, Sr.; John H. Segars; Carolyn Bruce; Bryant Gardner; John M. Milling; Elaine Reed; City Manager Howard Garland, all in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Flowers Ministries, Inc., a nonprofit organization operating as a church; J.L. Flowers, the church's “President/CEO”; and several members of the church (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in Plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Flowers Ministries Inc. v. Hines, No. 4:17-cv-00868-RBH, 2018 WL 3496749 (D.S.C. July 20, 2018). To the extent Plaintiffs seek to challenge the district court's orders denying their motion for a preliminary injunction and denying reconsideration of that order, we dismiss this portion of the appeal as moot. See Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 568 U.S. 85, 91, 133 S.Ct. 721, 184 L.Ed.2d 553 (2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-1004
Decided: September 21, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)