PIP v. NORTH CAROLINA (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Gwendolyn Dianne WILKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, People Improving Perpetuity, a/k/a PIP, Plaintiff, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 20-1037

Decided: September 16, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Gwendolyn Dianne Wilkes, Appellant Pro Se.

Gwendolyn Dianne Wilkes appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Wilkes's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkes v. North Carolina, No. 1:19-cv-00699-LCB-LPA, 2019 WL 7037401 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2019). We deny Wilkes's motions to be placed in the witness protection program, for immediate testing, and for a writ of quo warranto. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law