MARTYNUSKA v. BWW LAW GROUP LLC 20 (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Steven MARTYNUSKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC; Jon Doe 1-20, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-1174

Decided: August 27, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Steven Martynuska, Appellant Pro Se.

Steven Martynuska appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martynuska v. BWW Law Grp., LLC, No. 1:19-cv-00660-DKC, 2020 WL 374464 (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2020). We deny Martynuska's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law