Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jacqueline Calhoun-Smith TAYLOR, f/k/a Jacqueline L. Taylor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Walker WHITLOCK, on behalf of himself, unidentifiable primary stalker and other similarly situated, named and/or unnamed stalkers, representatives and others supporting their stalking efforts; Henry Whitlock, Brother to James Walker Whitlock; Ned Whitlock, Uncle to James, Henry, Helen, and Terry Whitlock, ex-military / McGuire; Terry Whitlock Pierce, Sister of James and Helen Whitlock; Helen Geneva Whitlock, Sister of James Whitlock; Barbara Wooldridge, Cousin to Whitlock/Taylors, Gang Leader for the women, also known as Honey Bee, also known as “Hundra Bee”; Primary Stalker, Primary Gang Leader, alleged husband of Barbara Wooldridge, also known as Woodrow Woodson, also known as John Appersom; Clairece Wooldridge, Sister of Barbara Wooldridge; Pamela Jean Taylor Whitlock, Ex sister-in-law, wife to Henry Whitlock; Shirelle Hope Taylor Whitlock, Daughter of Pamela Jean Whitlock; Earlean Greene, Ex member “The Saint Paul's Baptist Church,” Phillip Morris USA; Justine Greene, Alleged ex-girlfriend of plaintiff's ex-husband and friend to his family; V-Tech Employees; Hi Tech Property Maintenance Employees; All Black African American Males, Approximately 5 to 6 homeless, at times living in vehicles rear unloading area of Midlothian Kroger; Parking Lot Cleaners, Providing service over last ten years to Midlothian, Virginia Walmart, Martin stores, Kroger Grocery Stores, Charter Colony Shopping Center WaWa, Chesterfield Towne Center Mall, et cetera; Booington, Jr.; Booington, Sr.; Mr. Bloomington, Defendants-Appellees.
Jacqueline Calhoun-Smith Taylor appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taylor v. Whitlock, No. 3:19-cv-00606-JAG (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-1026
Decided: August 21, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)