DINKINS v. REGION TEN CSB (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Melvin DINKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REGION TEN CSB, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 20-1274

Decided: August 24, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Melvin Dinkins, Appellant Pro Se. James Morton Bowling, ST. JOHN, BOWLING & LAWRENCE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Melvin Dinkins appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and denying his postjudgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dinkins v. Region Ten CSB, No. 3:19-cv-00030-NKM (W.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2020 & March 5, 2020). We deny Dinkins' motion to expedite, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law