CHIN YOUNG v. UNITED STATES DOD MSPB (2020)

Christopher Chin-Young appeals the district court's order granting Defendants’ post-remand motion to dismiss Chin-Young's several claims related to his former federal employment.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chin-Young v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-01454-CMH-MSN, 2019 WL 6842538 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   After previously determining that a prior settlement agreement and a Merit Systems Protection Board decision barred most of Chin-Young's claims, we remanded the matter to the district court to determine in the first instance, what, if any, additional claims were not previously litigated. See Chin-Young v. United States, 774 F. App'x 106, 118 (4th Cir. 2019) (Nos. 17-2013/2017). On remand, the district court parsed through Chin-Young's complaint in compliance with our mandate and, after identifying several possible claims, nonetheless found those claims to be meritless.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.