Steve C. CHADWICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard J. GRAHAM, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.
Decided: July 27, 2020
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Steve Carl Chadwick, Appellant Pro Se.
Steve Carl Chadwick appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chadwick v. Graham, No. 1:19-cv-00596-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2019). We deny Chadwick's motions to appoint counsel, for leave to file an amended complaint, and for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
FOOTNOTE. Although the district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir. 2020).
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.