UNITED STATES v. REDD (2020)

Kunta Kenta Redd appeals the district court's order denying his motions seeking a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018 (the act), his motions filed under various rules, his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), and his motion seeking recusal and reassignment of the case to another district judge. Redd confines his appeal to the district court's denial of relief under the act and its denial of his recusal and reassignment request. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Redd, No. 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2020). We deny Redd's motions to appoint counsel and for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.