DAVIS v. BRITT USAG PRJ PRJ USMS (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Hon. W. Earl BRITT; Jeff Sessions, USAG; James Garnett, Jr., PRJ; Donald Hunter, PRJ; USMS Unknown Deputy, Defendants - Appellees.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Hon. W. Earl Britt; Jefferson B. Sessions III, USAG; James W. Garnett, Jr., PRJ; Donald Hunter, PRJ; USMS Unknown Deputy, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 19-6172, No. 20-6376

Decided: July 21, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court's order transferring his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Britt, No. 2:18-cv-00166-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. May 25, 2018). We deny Davis’ motions for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary, see Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183, 129 S.Ct. 1481, 173 L.Ed.2d 347 (2009), and deny his motion to supplement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law