Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Reinaldo OLAVARRIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; Roy Cooper, Governor, in his official capacity and private capacity; Regina Petteway, in her individual and private capacity; Tracy Champion, in her individual and private capacity; Tara Dawkins, in her individual and private capacity; Delores Taylor, in her individual and private capacity; Doretha Jones, in her individual and private capacity; Yetvette Griffin, in her individual and private capacity; Nicole Fields, in her individual and private capacity; Doreen Pearson, in her individual and private capacity; Therman Newton; Christina Hendericks, in her individual and private capacity; Mandy Cohen, in her individual and private capacity; James A. Smith, III, Chair of Wake County Board of Commissioners; Barbara Gibson, Director of North Carolina Office of State Human Resources, Defendants - Appellees.
Reinaldo Olavarria seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss, after a frivolity review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018), several of Olavarria's claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Olavarria seeks to appeal is neither a final order, as litigation of several claims, against several Defendants, remains ongoing in the district court, nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-1259
Decided: June 22, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)