IN RE: Tindrick ZEIGLER (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Tindrick ZEIGLER, Petitioner.

No. 20-1211

Decided: June 18, 2020

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Tindrick Zeigler, Petitioner Pro Se.

Tindrick Zeigler petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to comply with the district court's prior order to reconsider Zeigler's request for nunc pro tunc designation. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court entered an order granting Zeigler's motion to compel BOP to comply with the court's prior order on April 7, 2020, and BOP subsequently complied. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law