Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael J. FITZGIBBONS, acting on behalf of the Director of the South Carolina Department of Insurance, in his capacity as the Special Deputy Receiver of the South Carolina Health Cooperative, Inc., a Multiple Employer Self-Insured Health Plan on behalf of Director of the South Carolina Department of Insurance, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. De'Shaun WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant,
Alton Atkinson; John Thomas Childs, IV; Larry Busch; Cherise Raymond; Andre Garcia Littlejohn; Vickie Damon; Winston Cook; Kristin Ketterman; Daniel Wheeler; King Capital Group; A-Z Consulting LLC; Intermediary Network; Busch Law Center LLC; JJLJ Financial; Protege Investments LLC; IGWT Consulting LLC; Cook Business Services LLC; John Does 1-10, Defendants. Michael J. FitzGibbons, acting on behalf of the Director of the South Carolina Department of Insurance, in his capacity as the Special Deputy Receiver of the South Carolina Health Cooperative, Inc., a Multiple Employer Self-Insured Health Plan on behalf of Director of the South Carolina Department of Insurance, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Cherise Raymond, Defendant - Appellant, Alton Atkinson; John Thomas Childs, IV; Larry Busch; De'Shaun Williams; Andre Garcia Littlejohn; Vickie Damon; Winston Cook; Kristin Ketterman; Daniel Wheeler; King Capital Group; A-Z Consulting LLC; Intermediary Network; Busch Law Center LLC; JJLJ Financial; Protege Investments LLC; IGWT Consulting LLC; Cook Business Services LLC; John Does 1-10, Defendants.
Appellants De'Shaun Williams and Cherise Raymond seek to appeal the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and partially granting and partially denying Appellants’ respective motions for summary judgment on civil claims that they conspired to defraud South Carolina Health Cooperative, Inc. (“SCHC”), a multiple employer welfare arrangement. Appellee Michael J. FitzGibbons, acting in his capacity as the Special Deputy Receiver of SCHC, moves to dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant FitzGibbons’ motion and dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-1383, No. 20-1384
Decided: June 18, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)