FELIX v. US IAT (2020)

Daniel Felix and Christine Hutten appeal from the district court's December 16, 2019, order denying reconsideration of its October 7, 2019, order and judgment dismissing their civil action. On appeal, Felix and Hutten press challenges to these orders, to the court's interlocutory orders of January 7 and July 29, 2019, and to the magistrate judge's interlocutory order of June 11, 2019. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Felix and Hutten waived appellate review of the June 11 order by failing to timely object to it, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see Solis v. Malkani, 638 F.3d 269, 274 (4th Cir. 2011), and we therefore affirm that order. Felix and Hutten also fail to establish reversible error in the remaining orders, and we affirm them for the reasons stated by the district court. Felix v. Serv. Ins. Co., No. 2:18-cv-00031-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 7, July 29, Oct. 7 & Dec. 16, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.