Andre KING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. Warden MCFADDEN, Respondent - Appellee.
Decided: May 27, 2020
Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Andre King, Appellant Pro Se.
Andre King appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to extend or reopen the period to note an appeal from the order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Warden McFadden, No. 1:14-cv-00091-JMC, 2019 WL 6700157 (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.