JACKSON v. GIRL SCOUTS COUNCIL OF COLONIAL COAST (2020)

Repaunzel Jackson appeals the district court's order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2018), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2018), and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Jackson's state law breach of contract claims. We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments Jackson raises in her informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Finding no reversible error, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Jackson v. Girl Scouts Council, No. 4:18-cv-00129-MSD-RJK (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.