Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Alfutir Kareem Ideen MAYWEATHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. W. David GUICE, Commissioner, Department of Public Safety NC, Official and Individual Capacity; George T. Solomon, Director, Department of Public Safety NC, Official and Individual Capacity; Captain Auer, Security Risk Group Captain, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; Officer Locklear, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; G. Swink, Programs Director, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; Lieutenant Banks, Shipping and Receiving, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants - Appellees, Sergeant Spencer, Investigating Officer, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; H. Corpening, Correctional Administrator, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; J. Jenkins, Correctional Planner, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; Keith Turner, Unit Manager, Marion Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity; John Doe, Correctional Officer, Hyde Correctional Institute, Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants.
Alfutir Kareem Ideen Mayweather appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018), confining his appeal to the district court's denial of relief on his claim for denial of access to the courts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mayweather v. Guice, No. 1:17-cv-00100-FDW, 2020 WL 594503 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-6299
Decided: May 22, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)