IN RE: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION (2020)

Tomislav Milic appeals from the district court's order dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court's order denying his motion to reconsider an order approving the sale of real property, vacating the order authorizing the trustee to employ a real estate company, and denying compensation to the real estate company. The district court dismissed Milic's appeal for failure to timely file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002; Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007) (“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Milic v. McCarthy, 613 B.R. 642 (E.D. Va. 2019). We deny the trustee's motion to dismiss the appeal, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.