UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Ricky McKinley INGRAM, Defendant - Appellant.
Decided: April 20, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Through counsel, Ricky McKinley Ingram appeals the district court's order denying his motion, filed pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222, for a reduction in Ingram's 262-month sentence. We have considered Ingram's arguments on appeal in conjunction with the record and find the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce Ingram's custodial sentence. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 1:06-cr-00460-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.