Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Rufus Lamar PARKER, a/k/a Rudy Parker, Defendant - Appellant.
Rufus Lamar Parker pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to six counts of distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2018). Parker subsequently pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to distribute an unspecified amount of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (2018). The district court imposed a 78-month sentence on each count, to run concurrently. Parker appeals his sentence by raising two challenges to the calculation of his Sentencing Guidelines range.
The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal as barred by Parker’s waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea agreement for the conspiracy count. Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Parker knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence on the conspiracy charge and that the sentencing issues Parker seeks to raise on appeal fall squarely within the scope of his waiver of appellate rights. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss as to the conspiracy count. Although not encompassed by the plea waiver, we decline to review Parker’s challenge to his other, concurrent sentences under the concurrent sentence doctrine, see United States v. Charles, 932 F.3d 153, 155 (4th Cir. 2019), and therefore affirm the remainder of the criminal judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-4299
Decided: April 14, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)