MOTA BRAGA v. BARR (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Edgar MOTA-BRAGA, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 19-2133

Decided: March 30, 2020

Before KING, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Edgar Mota-Braga, Petitioner Pro Se. Sabatino Fioravante Leo, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Edgar Mota-Braga, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his third motion to reopen and reconsider. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Urbina v. Holder, 745 F.3d 736, 741 (4th Cir. 2014) (stating standard of review); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009) (same). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law